List your practice on our marketplace
How to find success on our platform
Done-with-you client acquisition system
Growth tools and pricing plans
Designing Your Life is a life-design methodology created by Bill Burnett and Dave Evans at Stanford, set out in their 2016 bestseller Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-Lived, Joyful Life and refined over more than a decade of teaching the wildly popular course at Stanford's Life Design Lab. Its premise is that the same design-thinking process used to build great products can be turned on a human life, and that a life, like a product, is built by prototyping your way forward, not by thinking your way to a single correct answer.
For a vision library, Designing Your Life fills a distinctive and practical role. Most vision work asks you to articulate the future you want and then pursue it. Burnett and Evans reject that as a hidden trap, the belief that there is one right life waiting to be discovered and executed. In its place they offer a method built for people who do not have a clear vision and are not sure they ever will: get curious, talk to people, try things, build small experiments, and let a direction emerge from action. It is the framework most concerned with generating and testing possible futures rather than committing to one in advance.
The method's defining move is the Odyssey Plan, designing three different, fully imagined five-year versions of your life and holding them side by side. Rather than betting everything on a single future, you treat your life as a space of multiple viable possibilities, then prototype toward the ones that pull. It is vision work for the person who is stuck precisely because they have been waiting to feel certain before they move.
Originators — Bill Burnett and Dave Evans, Stanford Life Design Lab
Foundational work — Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-Lived, Joyful Life (2016)
Core idea — Apply design thinking to your own life; build your way forward through prototypes
The five mindsets — Curiosity · Bias to Action · Reframing · Awareness (wayfinding) · Radical Collaboration
Signature tools — Workview & Lifeview · Good Time Journal · Odyssey Plans (three five-year futures) · Prototyping (conversations and experiences) · reframing Dysfunctional Beliefs and Gravity Problems
Central claim — "Passion is the result of a good life design, not the cause"
Scale — Individual; spans the whole-life domains of work, play, love, and health
Bill Burnett — Executive Director of the Design Program at Stanford and an adjunct professor in mechanical engineering design, with a background designing products (including early work in Silicon Valley). Burnett brought the discipline of design thinking, empathy, ideation, prototyping, iteration, and reframed it as a method anyone can apply to the problem of their own life.
Dave Evans — Co-founder of the Stanford Life Design Lab, lecturer in the design program, and a co-founder of Electronic Arts. Evans brought decades of experience in product development and vocational mentoring, and co-developed the course and book that turned life design into a global movement.
Burnett and Evans began teaching life design at Stanford as a response to a recurring problem: bright, capable students (and later, adults of every age) who were paralysed about what to do with their lives because they were waiting to discover a single true passion or correct path. Drawing on the design-thinking methodology already central to Stanford's d.school and design program, they built a course that treated "what should I do with my life?" as a design problem rather than a question with one findable answer.
The course became one of the most popular at Stanford, and in 2016 the two distilled it into Designing Your Life, which became a #1 New York Times bestseller and spawned a wider life-design movement: additional books, workshops, and a global community of trained life-design facilitators and coaches. Its central reframes (that you can live several different good lives, that passion follows action rather than preceding it, that you build your way forward) entered mainstream career and life-transition thinking.
Designing Your Life runs on five mindsets, expressed through a set of concrete tools.
The five mindsets. Curiosity makes everything new and reveals possibilities. Bias to action means building your way forward by trying things rather than only analysing them. Reframing shifts a stuck problem so a new solution space opens. Awareness / wayfinding accepts that life design is a journey of setting direction, not reaching a fixed destination. Radical collaboration recognises that a well-designed life is built with others, not alone.
Clarify Workview and Lifeview. Two short written reflections, what work is for and what life is for, that, compared against each other, surface a person's operating philosophy and where their views of work and life align or clash. This is the closest the method comes to defining a "why," and it deliberately stays open rather than prescriptive.
Find the energy and engagement (Good Time Journal). A logging practice tracking when you are engaged and energised versus drained. It replaces abstract guessing about what you want with empirical evidence from your own lived days.
Ideate multiple futures (Odyssey Plans). The signature exercise: design three distinct five-year versions of your life, typically (1) more of your current path, (2) what you'd do if that path vanished, and (3) what you'd do if money and image were no object. Holding three viable futures at once breaks the tyranny of the single right answer and exposes how many good lives are genuinely available.
Prototype. Test possible directions cheaply before committing, through prototype conversations (talking to people living a version of the life you're considering) and prototype experiences (small, low-cost trials). Prototyping converts speculation into data and de-risks big moves.
Reframe what's stuck. Two specific tools. Dysfunctional beliefs are the myths that keep people stuck ("it's too late," "I must find my one passion," "my degree determines my career"), each replaced with a reframe. Gravity problems are circumstances you cannot actually change: not solvable problems but conditions to accept and design around, freeing energy for the problems that are actionable.
Three features give Designing Your Life its particular value.
It works for people who have no clear vision. Most vision frameworks assume you can name the future you want. This one is built precisely for those who cannot, and treats that uncertainty as a normal design condition rather than a failure. For a coach, it is a complete process for moving a stuck client forward without forcing premature clarity.
It replaces certainty with prototyping. The bias-to-action and prototyping tools convert vision from a high-stakes bet into a series of low-cost experiments. This is one of the most practical de-risking mechanisms in any vision approach, and it gives a coach concrete homework between sessions.
Its reframes dissolve common blocks. The dysfunctional-beliefs and gravity-problems tools are fast, memorable, and directly target the assumptions that most often keep people stuck. They give a coach precise language for naming and shifting a client's limiting beliefs.
Designing Your Life is a practitioner methodology grounded in design thinking and applied vocational research rather than a controlled-trial intervention:
Foundational work — Burnett & Evans, Designing Your Life (2016) and subsequent titles; over a decade of iteration through the Stanford course.
Institutional home — The Stanford Life Design Lab, which continues to develop curricula, tools, and facilitator training.
Supporting research — Draws on design-thinking practice and on vocational and adolescence research (e.g., on how passion develops) that the authors cite, notably the finding that passion typically follows mastery and engagement rather than preceding them.
Nature of the evidence — Its authority rests on design-thinking principles, large-scale teaching experience, and broad practitioner adoption rather than randomised outcome studies. Best held as a robust, well-tested method rather than an experimentally proven mechanism.
Career crossroads and transitions — The method's home ground: people deciding what's next who don't have a single clear answer. Odyssey Plans and prototyping are purpose-built for it.
Life redesign and purpose — The whole-life framing (work, play, love, health) and Workview/Lifeview make it a strong fit for broad "what now, what for" questions.
Getting unstuck — Reframing dysfunctional beliefs and separating gravity problems from actionable ones is a fast route out of paralysis.
Recovering from burnout — Energy tracking (Good Time Journal) and prototyping a different way of working translate well to redesigning an unsustainable life.
Early-career and graduate decisions — Originally built for exactly this population; especially useful where there is no obvious path.
Less suited for — situations that genuinely require committing hard to one long-horizon vision (where a BHAG-style approach fits better); people who already have deep clarity and need execution discipline more than ideation; problems that are purely about follow-through rather than direction.
It resists singular commitment. The method's strength, holding multiple futures and prototyping, can become a weakness for someone who actually needs to commit fully to one demanding long-term vision. It is better at opening possibilities than at sustaining a decades-long bet.
Prototyping has real-world limits. Not every life direction can be cheaply prototyped; some require large, irreversible commitments that small experiments only partially de-risk. Access to prototype conversations and experiences is also unevenly distributed.
Light on the deeper "why." Workview and Lifeview touch values, but the method is deliberately pragmatic and stops short of the deeper excavation of purpose or identity that other frameworks pursue. It is a process for building a workable life more than for surfacing a soul-level calling.
Practitioner, not experimental, evidence. Its support is teaching experience and design-thinking lineage rather than controlled studies; the claims are credible and well-tested but not proven in the clinical sense.
Theory U / Presencing — shared prototyping logic. Both insist that vision is realised by building and testing in the real world rather than only thinking; Theory U works the deep inner source, while Designing Your Life works the practical experiment.
Ikigai — complementary domain map. Ikigai offers a structure for what a meaningful direction contains; Designing Your Life offers the process for prototyping toward it.
Lifebook Methodology — parallel whole-life design. Both treat life as multi-domain and designable; Lifebook drives toward a defined vision in each category, while Designing Your Life keeps options open and tests forward.
Designing Your Life is most directly learned from the book Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-Lived, Joyful Life (2016) and its companion volumes, which contain the full set of exercises. The Stanford Life Design Lab publishes free resources, including Odyssey Plan and prototyping guides, and the authors have taught online courses on the method. A global community of trained life-design coaches and facilitators offers workshops and one-to-one guidance. Because it is an open methodology rather than a single proprietary certification, coaches typically learn it from the books and Stanford resources, optionally add facilitator training, and integrate the tools directly into career, transition, and life-design coaching.
You don't think your way forward into a new life. You build your way forward. Passion is the result of a good design, not its cause.
Designing Your Life is a life-design methodology from Stanford's Bill Burnett and Dave Evans, set out in their 2016 book of the same name. It applies design-thinking tools — curiosity, prototyping, reframing — to the problem of building a meaningful life, on the principle that you build your way forward rather than think your way to one right answer.