List your practice on our marketplace
How to find success on our platform
Done-with-you client acquisition system
Growth tools and pricing plans
Acceptance and Commitment Training is the coaching-relevant application of the work Steven C. Hayes originally developed as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). In coaching it is used not as a clinical intervention but as a structured way to help people clarify what they most deeply value and build the willingness to move toward it even when doing so is uncomfortable. Hayes himself uses both readings of the acronym, Therapy and Training, precisely because the underlying skills apply to any human navigating a meaningful life, not only to clinical populations.
A clear scope boundary applies here. ACT in its full form is a therapeutic modality for psychological suffering, delivered by licensed clinicians. This page describes only the coaching-relevant slice: values clarification (choosing the life directions one wants to stand for) and willingness (the readiness to carry difficult thoughts and feelings in service of those directions). Coaches use these processes to support clients in living and leading by their values. They do not use them to treat anxiety, depression, trauma, or any clinical condition; that work belongs with a licensed therapist, and a responsible coach refers when clinical issues appear.
Within that boundary, ACT-informed coaching sharpens one of the most important questions in vision work: not only what do you want? but what are you willing to carry for it? Values, in this tradition, are chosen directions rather than goals to be checked off, and willingness is the price of moving in a valued direction when discomfort inevitably arises. This makes ACT a powerful complement to vision and life-design work, where a compelling future is only as real as the client's willingness to pay its emotional cost.
Originator — Steven C. Hayes (University of Nevada, Reno); ACT developed in the early-to-mid 1980s
Coaching scope — Values clarification and willingness; not clinical treatment (which requires a licensed therapist)
Hayes's own framing — "Acceptance and Commitment Training" for non-clinical use; the skills apply to any human role
Core organising idea — Psychological flexibility: the ability to stay present, open to experience, and acting on chosen values
Coaching-relevant processes — Values (chosen life directions) · Willingness / acceptance · Committed action
Theoretical foundation — Relational Frame Theory; functional contextualism
Foundational works — Hayes, A Liberated Mind: How to Pivot Toward What Matters (2019); Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (academic foundation)
Steven C. Hayes — Foundation Professor of Psychology at the University of Nevada, Reno, and the originator of ACT, which he developed beginning in the early 1980s. Hayes is also the developer of Relational Frame Theory, the account of human language and cognition that underlies ACT. He has consistently framed the approach as applicable beyond the clinic, as "Training" as well as "Therapy," because the core processes describe how any person can move toward a meaningful life. His 2019 book A Liberated Mind is the most accessible statement of the approach for a general and applied audience.
Kirk Strosahl and Kelly Wilson — Hayes's co-authors on the foundational academic text Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Wilson in particular has been central to the development of ACT's values work, the component most directly relevant to coaching.
Hayes developed ACT in the early-to-mid 1980s, growing it out of his work on cognitive distancing and, more deeply, out of Relational Frame Theory, his functional-contextual account of how human language generates both extraordinary capability and unnecessary suffering. The central clinical insight was that much human distress comes not from difficult thoughts and feelings themselves but from experiential avoidance, the costly effort to suppress, eliminate, or escape them, and from cognitive fusion, being entangled in one's thoughts as if they were literal truth.
Over the following decades ACT accumulated a substantial clinical evidence base across a wide range of presenting concerns, organised around the single construct of psychological flexibility. As the approach matured, its applicability beyond the clinic became increasingly clear: the same processes that help a clinical client stop avoiding pain help a non-clinical person clarify what they value and act on it. Hayes formalised this dual readability in the "Acceptance and Commitment Training" framing and brought the approach to a wide applied audience in A Liberated Mind (2019). It is from this non-clinical lineage that ACT-informed coaching draws, using the values and willingness processes while leaving clinical treatment to licensed practitioners.
ACT's full model comprises six interrelated processes that together produce psychological flexibility. Coaching draws principally on three of them; the others (defusion, present-moment awareness, and self-as-context) inform the stance but shade toward clinical work and should be held lightly by a coach.
Values — chosen life directions. The cornerstone of the coaching application. Values in ACT are not goals; they are freely chosen directions: qualities of living one wants to embody, like "being a present parent" or "leading with integrity." A direction is never "completed"; it is moved toward continually. The coaching move is to help the client distinguish values they have genuinely chosen from those inherited or imposed, and to surface the question: what would you want to stand for, even when it is hard?
Willingness / acceptance. The readiness to make room for difficult thoughts and feelings, discomfort, fear, uncertainty, rather than organising life around avoiding them. In a coaching frame, willingness is reframed as the price of a valued direction: moving toward what matters reliably brings discomfort, and willingness is the choice to carry it rather than retreat. This is acceptance as an active stance toward valued living, not passive resignation.
Committed action. Translating chosen values into concrete, sustained patterns of behaviour, taking steps in the valued direction and returning to the path when one strays. This is where ACT-informed coaching connects to ordinary goal and accountability work, but with goals anchored in values rather than floating free.
The integrating idea — psychological flexibility. All three processes serve a single capacity: staying in contact with the present, open to experience, and acting on chosen values regardless of the difficult internal experiences that arise. The "what would you stand for even if it's hard" question is the practical heart of the coaching application, joining values and willingness in one move.
Three features make the values-and-willingness slice of ACT especially useful.
It puts a price on the vision. Vision and goal work can stay comfortably aspirational. ACT forces the harder question, what discomfort are you willing to carry to move toward this, which is often exactly the question that converts a wish into a commitment.
Values are directions, not destinations. Because values can never be "finished," they provide a durable compass that survives setbacks and completed goals alike. For clients prone to "arrival fallacy," achieving the goal and feeling empty, values-based direction is a more sustaining frame.
It reframes discomfort as the cost of meaning, not a problem to fix. Rather than trying to eliminate the fear or doubt that accompanies meaningful change, ACT-informed coaching helps the client make room for it and move anyway. This is a more honest and more durable stance than promising to remove the discomfort.
The full ACT model has a large clinical evidence base; the coaching application draws on the parts most relevant to non-clinical growth:
Clinical research base — ACT has been studied in a large body of randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses across many presenting concerns, organised around psychological flexibility as the active process. This is clinical evidence and does not, on its own, establish coaching outcomes.
Process-level support — The components most used in coaching, values clarification and willingness/acceptance, have process research suggesting they contribute to wellbeing and valued living in non-clinical populations.
Foundational literature — Hayes, A Liberated Mind (2019) for the applied statement; Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for the academic foundation; the Relational Frame Theory literature for the theoretical base.
Coaching-specific research — An emerging body of work examines ACT-informed coaching specifically; it is younger and thinner than the clinical literature, and coaches should represent the evidence accordingly.
Burnout and overwhelm — A strong fit within the coaching scope. ACT helps a depleted client reconnect with what they actually value and choose how to carry the unavoidable discomforts of work and life, rather than continuing to avoid or override them.
Life redesign and purpose — Values clarification is a direct tool for the "what now, and what for" question, anchoring a redesigned life in chosen directions rather than borrowed scripts.
Decision-making under uncertainty — When a client is stuck between options, clarifying the values at stake and the willingness each path requires often dissolves the paralysis.
Leadership and values-based action — Leaders who want to act with integrity under pressure benefit from naming their leadership values and building willingness to act on them when it costs something.
Less suited for — anything involving clinical concerns (anxiety disorders, depression, trauma, addiction), which require a licensed therapist and are outside the coaching scope entirely; clients who want purely tactical, behaviour-only coaching with no values dimension; situations where a coach without ACT training risks drifting into quasi-therapeutic territory. The responsible move is to stay with values and willingness and refer when clinical material surfaces.
The clinical/coaching line requires real discipline. ACT's origins are therapeutic, and its processes can pull a coach toward clinical territory. A coach must hold a firm boundary, values and willingness for valued living, not treatment of suffering, and refer to a licensed professional when clinical issues appear. This is the single most important limitation to respect.
Acceptance language can be misread as resignation. Willingness and acceptance are active stances toward valued action, not passivity or tolerating harmful situations. Poorly framed, they can be misunderstood as "just put up with it," which is a misapplication.
Values work can stay abstract. Naming values is easy; translating them into committed action under real discomfort is the hard part. Without the committed-action component, values clarification risks becoming a pleasant but inert exercise.
Coaching evidence is younger than clinical evidence. The robust evidence base is clinical; coaches should not overstate it as proof of coaching outcomes, and should describe the coaching application honestly as an emerging area.
Positive Psychology — adjacent wellbeing science. Both concern flourishing and meaning; positive psychology emphasises strengths and positive states, while ACT emphasises willingness to carry difficulty in service of values. Complementary perspectives on a meaningful life.
Internal Family Systems — complementary inner-work frame. IFS works with the parts of a person that resist a valued direction; ACT works with the willingness to act on values while those difficult inner experiences are present. Both are used, within scope, to support values-based living.
The most accessible entry point for the coaching-relevant material is Hayes's A Liberated Mind (2019), which presents the core processes for a general audience and explicitly frames the approach as "Training" usable beyond the clinic. The academic foundation is Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson's Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, with the deeper theory in the Relational Frame Theory literature. Formal ACT training is delivered principally through the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science and clinically-oriented programmes; coaches who want to use ACT-informed values and willingness work responsibly are advised to study the approach seriously, stay rigorously within the coaching scope, and maintain referral relationships with licensed clinicians for anything that crosses into clinical territory.
The question is not only what you want. It is what you are willing to carry for it — and which directions you would still choose to stand for when they cost you something.
In coaching, ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Training) refers to the non-clinical application of Steven Hayes's Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, focused on two core processes: values clarification — helping a client choose the life directions they want to stand for — and willingness, the readiness to carry difficult thoughts and feelings in service of those directions. Hayes uses both readings of the acronym, Therapy and Training, because the underlying skills apply to any human living a meaningful life. The coaching application supports values-based living and leadership; it does not treat psychological conditions, which require a licensed therapist.