Question 1

What is Ontological Coaching?

Accepted Answer

Ontological Coaching is a philosophical-existential coaching methodology that treats human beings as constituted in three interwoven domains — language, emotion, and the body — and treats coaching as the work of shifting how a person observes themselves and the world. The methodology emerged in the 1970s and 1980s through the work of Chilean philosopher Fernando Flores, was systematised for coaching by Julio Olalla and Rafael Echeverria in the early 1990s, and is taught principally through Newfield Network (founded by Olalla in 1996) and adjacent institutions including New Ventures West and Newfield Consulting. The methodology's distinguishing claim is that durable change comes from shifting the observer the client is being, not from new behaviour layered on the existing observer.

Question 2

Who founded Ontological Coaching?

Accepted Answer

The conceptual founder is Fernando Flores, a Chilean engineer, philosopher, and politician who served in Salvador Allende's government as Finance Minister until the September 1973 coup. Imprisoned and later released, Flores relocated to California and developed the philosophical foundations at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Julio Olalla and Rafael Echeverria, both Chilean and former students/colleagues of Flores, translated those foundations into a teachable coaching curriculum and constituted the original Newfield programs in Boulder, Colorado in 1990. Olalla formally established Newfield Network in 1996. Echeverria's Newfield Consulting carries the lineage in the Spanish-speaking world.

Question 3

What are the three domains of being?

Accepted Answer

Ontological Coaching treats every human being as constituted in three interwoven dimensions: language, emotion, and the body (somatics). Language covers what we say and what we listen for, including the inner conversation. Emotion covers the moods we live in — not moods of the moment but standing dispositions like resentment, resignation, ambition, acceptance, or wonder, that shape what we see as possible. The body covers the postures, breathing patterns, and somatic structures that condition action. The methodology insists on working in all three simultaneously, on the premise that any one alone produces partial or temporary change.

Question 4

What is 'the Observer' in ontological coaching?

Accepted Answer

The Observer is Ontological Coaching's central diagnostic. It is the structure of interpretations through which a person makes sense of the world — the lens that determines what they notice, what they miss, what they assess as possible or impossible, what they take as given. Drawing on Maturana's biology of cognition, the methodology argues that two people facing the same situation produce different actions because they are different Observers. Action and results follow from the Observer. The coach's first move is to help the client notice the Observer they are being and to discover that other Observers are available to them.

Question 5

What are speech acts and why do they matter?

Accepted Answer

Drawing directly on John Searle and J.L. Austin's analytic philosophy of language, Ontological Coaching classifies linguistic action into recognisable types. Declarations are acts that bring something into being — a commitment, a 'no', the opening of a possibility. Assertions are claims about what is so, evaluable as true or false. Requests ask another person to take action; offers propose to take action; promises commit to action; assessments are judgements. The methodology treats the coaching conversation as the place where new linguistic acts can be made, and where the client can practise speech acts that have been missing from their repertoire.

Question 6

How is Ontological Coaching different from other coaching methodologies?

Accepted Answer

Most coaching frameworks emphasise one dimension: cognitive frames in CBT-derived approaches, behaviour in performance coaching, somatic experience in somatic-based work. Ontological Coaching insists on language, emotion, and body simultaneously and treats the Observer the client is being as the primary working terrain. The methodology is also unusually philosophical — it teaches Heidegger and Maturana as part of the curriculum and treats the client as a being capable of engaging with first-order questions about how to live. Its claim is that durable change comes from a shift in the observer, not new behaviour layered on the old observer; the behaviour follows.

Question 7

Where does Ontological Coaching come from philosophically?

Accepted Answer

The methodology's principal philosophical sources are Martin Heidegger (ontology, being-in-the-world), Humberto Maturana (biology of cognition, Theory of the Observer, structural determinism), John Searle and J.L. Austin (speech-act theory, performative utterances), and Maurice Merleau-Ponty (embodied phenomenology). Wittgenstein's view of language constructing reality is also part of the lineage. Fernando Flores synthesised these sources into a unified theory of language as action while at UC Berkeley and Stanford in the late 1970s and 1980s. Olalla and Echeverria then translated the synthesis into a coaching curriculum that teaches the underlying philosophy as part of the training.

Question 8

Is Ontological Coaching evidence-based?

Accepted Answer

The evidence base is substantial in foundational scholarly sources, established institutional practice, and practitioner-reported outcomes, but lighter in randomised outcome trials than brief evidence-based methodologies like Solution-Focused Coaching or Motivational Interviewing. Newfield Network has thirty years of sustained corporate adoption — IBM, NASA, the World Bank, and Fortune 500 organisations across multiple sectors. Foundational coaching texts include Echeverria's Ontology of Language, Olalla's From Knowledge to Wisdom, and Sieler's three-volume Coaching to the Human Soul. Most published outcomes are qualitative case-based or reported through practitioner literature; the methodology's depth and length make randomised trial designs difficult to construct.

Question 9

When is Ontological Coaching most useful?

Accepted Answer

Ontological Coaching is most useful where the client's stuck pattern is genuinely about identity, meaning, or the limits of their current way of being — not where the issue is short-term behavioural change or symptom relief. Leadership and executive coaching is the methodology's strongest fit; sophisticated executives, founders, and senior leaders who have outgrown lighter coaching frames often find ontological work matches their depth. Career and life crossroads are the second strong fit, where the question who am I being and what does it cost me to keep being that is the work itself. Less suited for short-term, behaviour-focused engagements where the client does not want to engage with existential questions.

Question 10

Where can I learn Ontological Coaching?

Accepted Answer

Newfield Network is the principal institution, with offices in North America and Latin America and a multi-year coach training pathway. New Ventures West, founded by James Flaherty in San Francisco, teaches a closely-aligned ontological-somatic methodology. Newfield Consulting, Rafael Echeverria's institutional vehicle, operates principally in the Spanish-speaking world. The Coach Partnership (formerly Newfield Asia) delivers the Newfield curriculum across Asia and Australia. Foundational reading includes Echeverria's Ontology of Language, Olalla's From Knowledge to Wisdom, Alan Sieler's three-volume Coaching to the Human Soul, Chalmers Brothers's Language and the Pursuit of Happiness, and Winograd and Flores's Understanding Computers and Cognition.

Find a Coach

Learn More

Grow Your Practice

Training & Certification

Resources

Ontological Coaching

About

Questions about Ontological Coaching